Surgery for Complicated Stomal Prolapse: Is the Altemeier Technique an Option? A Report of Three Cases / Cirurgia para prolapso de estoma complicado: A técnica de Altemeier é uma opção? Um relato de três casos

Abstract Introduction The incidence of stomal prolapse ranges from 2% to 22%. The risk factors include colostomy, the short length of the stoma, obesity, emergency surgery, and the improper (or even absence of) marking of the preoperative site for the stoma. Complicated stomal prolapse associated with severe mucosal irritation, ischemic changes, or bleeding requires surgical intervention. Objective To describe the use of the Altemeier technique in the management of cases of complicated prolapsed stoma after failure of the local medical measures and manual reduction. Methods Case series of three patients with past history of abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer and permanent end colostomy presented with irreducible prolapse of the stoma. After the failure of the local measures and manual reduction, urgent surgical intervention using the modified Altemeier technique was necessary. Results The modified Altemeier technique is simple, presents low risk of operative and postoperative complications, besides enabling an early recovery, with a lower risk of recurrence during the first 6 months after the repair. Conclusion Themodified Altemeier technique may be a valid therapeutic modality in the setting of complicated prolapsed stoma.

Resumo Introdução A incidência de prolapso de estoma varia de 2 a 22%. Os fatores de risco incluem colostomia, comprimento curto do estoma, obesidade, cirurgias de emergência, e marcação não adequada (ou atémesmo ausente) do sítio pré-operatório para o estoma. Prolapso de estoma complicado e associado a irritação grave de mucosa, alterações isquêmicas, ou sangramento requer intervenção cirúrgica. Objetivo Descrever o uso da técnica de Altemeier para o manejo de prolapso de estoma complicado após fracasso das medidas médicas locais e da redução manual. Métodos Série de casos de três pacientes com histórico de ressecção abdominoperineal de câncer retal e colostomia terminal permanente apresentaram prolapso irredutível do estoma. Com o fracasso das medidas locais e da redução manual, fezse necessária intervenção cirúrgica de emergência usando a técnica de Altemeier modificada. Resultados A técnica de Altemeier modificada é simples e apresenta risco baixo de complicações operatórias e pós-operatórias, além de possibilitar uma recuperação precoce, com menor risco de recorrência durante os 6 primeiros meses após o reparo. Conclusão A técnica de Altemeier modificada pode ser uma modalidade terapêutica válida em casos de prolapso de estoma complicado.

Research progress on urogenital function preservation in extralevator abdominoperineal resection / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) has been suggested to potentially improve oncological outcomes in advanced low rectal cancer patients. However, the urogenital function impairment as one of the main complications deteriorates the quality of life in these patients. The key point to prevent urogenital function impairment is to avoid autonomic nerve injury, including the superior and inferior hypogastric nerve plexus and neurovascular bundle. Three areas should be especially focused during surgery, including the posterolateral aspect of the prostate during the separation of the rectum from prostate, the lateral wall of ischioanal fossa and the area in front of anal canal. Previous presumption supposed that extended resection, though promoting oncologic outcomes, might lead to enlarged injury to surrounding vessels and nerves that deteriorated patients′ urogenital function. But recent studies show that postoperative urogenital function outcomes of rectal cancer patients who underwent ELAPE are not inferior to conventional APE after the induction of minimal invasive approaches including laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Their quality of life can be comparable with patients who underwent conventional APE, and are even better in some particular area. Moreover, as further improvement of ELAPE procedure has been made, the concept of individualized ELAPE addressed the importance of personalized surgical procedure based on tumor stage and location, dedicating to avoid injury to vessels and nerves through preserving more surrounding tissues. Urogenital function outcomes, as part of postoperative outcomes, get more and more attention in recent years. We review current studies on urogenital function after ELAPE from anatomy to clinical research, in order to raise surgeons′ attention of nerve preservation technique and to improve their understanding of ELAPE procedure.

Risk factor analysis for perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection in elderly patients with rectal cancer / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the risk factors of perineal incision complications after abdominal abdominoperineal resection (APR) in elderly patients with rectal cancer.@*Methods@#From January 2007 to September 2018, the clinical data of 72 elderly rectal cancer patients (age≥80 years) underwent abdominoperineal resection at Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors of perineal incision complications in elderly patients with rectal cancer after APR.@*Results@#Of the 76 patients, 47 were male and 25 were female, with an average age of (81.8±1.8) years. The incidence of postoperative perineal incision complications was 23.6% (17/72), including 5 cases of wound infection, 4 cases of incision fat liquefaction, and 8 cases of delayed wound healing. All of the patients were well recovered and discharged without death. The result of univariate analysis showed that, the occurrence of perineal incision complications was associated with serum albumin level < 35g/L (χ2=4.860, P=0.027), intraperitoneal chemotherapy with fluorouracil sustained release/lobaplatin rinse (χ2=8.827, P=0.003), pelvic restoration (χ2=9.062, P=0.003), diabetes (χ2=6.387, P=0.011) and coronary heart disease (χ2=7.688, P=0.006). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the intraoperative pelvic restoration (OR=0.17, 95% CI: 0.04~0.82, P=0.027) and diabetes (OR=4.32, 95% CI: 1.05~17.81, P=0.043) were independent risk factors for perineal incision complications.@*Conclusions@#Elderly patients with rectal cancer who undergo APR should preserve and restore the pelvic peritoneum as much as possible. Moreover, perioperative blood glucose monitoring is a powerful guarantee for preventing complications of perineal incision.

Perineal repair after abdominoperineal excision with rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap / Reconstrução do períneo após amputação abdominoperineal com retalho pediculado do músculo reto abdominal

ABSTRACT Background: Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APR) remains the only potential curative treatment for very low rectal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Yet, it implies a significant perineal exenteration and has set the attention on the perineal reconstruction. Aim: To present technique used in one case of APR for anal cancer, with resection of the vaginal posterior wall with large perineal defect which has called for the necessity of a flap for reconstruction Method: To cover the large perineal defect and reconstruct the posterior vaginal wall was perform a standardized and reproducible surgical technique using oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ORAM) flap. The overlying skin of this flap is thick and well vascularized by both superficial branches and perforators of the superior epigastric artery and the deep inferior epigastric artery which serves as the vascular pedicle for the ORAM flap. Results: This procedure was applied in a 65-year-old woman with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus infiltrating the posterior wall of the vagina. Was performed an APR with en-bloc resection of the vaginal posterior wall in order to achieve tumor-free margins. Postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged home at postoperative day 9. Final pathological report confirmed the oncological adequacy of the procedure (R0) and showed a rypT4N0 lesion. Conclusion: Flap reconstruction is an effective way to cover the perineal wound reducing both perineal complication rate and wound healing delay. The ORAM is particularly interesting for female whose tumors require resection and subsequent reconstruction of the posterior wall of the vagina.

RESUMO Racional: A amputação abdominoperineal do reto (APR) continua sendo o único tratamento curativo nos casos de adenocarcinoma retal muito baixo e carcinoma espinocelular do ânus. No entanto, implica em exenteração perineal significativa e exige atenção na reconstrução perineal. Objetivo: Propor, ilustrando com um caso clinico, proposta de APR para câncer anal com ressecção da parede posterior da vagina com cobertura do grande defeito perineal através de reconstrução com retalho miocutâneo oblíquo do reto abdominal (ORAM). Método: Para cobrir o defeito e reconstruir a parede vaginal posterior, realizou-se técnica de retalho miocutâneo oblíquo do reto abdominal (ORAM). A pele subjacente desse retalho por ser espessa e bem vascularizada por ramos perforantes superficiais da artéria epigástrica superior e pela artéria epigástrica inferior profunda serviu como pedículo vascular. Resultado: Este procedimento foi aplicado em uma mulher de 65 anos com recidiva de carcinoma espinocelular do ânus infiltrado na parede posterior da vagina. Foi realizada APR com ressecção em bloco da parede posterior vaginal com o objetivo de obter margens livres de tumor. O pós-operatório transcorreu sem intercorrências e a paciente recebeu alta hospitalar no 9° dia pós-operatório. O relatório patológico final confirmou a adequação oncológica do procedimento (R0) e mostrou uma lesão rypT4N0 de 6,5 cm. Conclusão: A reconstrução perineal com utilização de retalho é maneira eficaz de fechar a ferida operatória, reduzindo a taxa de complicações perineais e o atraso na cicatrização. O retalho de tipo ORAM é particularmente interessante para mulheres cujos tumores requerem ressecção e subsequente reconstrução da parede posterior da vagina.

Evaluación comparativa en calidad de vida de pacientes con RAUB, RAUBIE vs RAP por cáncer de recto. Informe preliminar / Comparative evaluation in quality of life of patients with RAUB, RAUBIE vs APR for rectal cancer. Preliminary report

Resumen Introducción: La resección abdominoperineal (RAP) era el tratamiento estándar del cáncer de recto medio o bajo quedando el paciente sin ano y con una ostomía permanente. En los últimos 20 años el desarrollo de nuevas técnicas quirúrgicas, con adecuados resultados quirúrgicos y oncológicos, han permitido ofrecer al paciente la preservación del aparato esfinteriano, sin embargo, éstas pueden presentar problemas de tipo funcional lo que podría derivar en una alteración de la calidad de vida del paciente. Objetivo: Comparar la alteración en la calidad de vida en pacientes sometidos a RAP versus técnicas con preservación de esfínter anal en pacientes operados por cáncer de recto. Materiales y Método: Estudio de cohorte transversal con pacientes operados por cáncer de recto medio-bajo en nuestro hospital entre los años 2009 a 2015. Se utiliza el instrumento EuroQuol-5D2,3 validado en español chileno. Resultados: Se incluyen 39 pacientes, 11 corresponden a colostomía definitiva y 28 a preservación de esfínter. En el análisis por dominios se observaron diferencias significativas en el grupo con ostomía definitiva en el ítem de actividades habituales y a favor de la preservación de esfínter en el ítem sexualidad. Conclusiones: La técnica quirúrgica utilizada en pacientes con cáncer rectal medio-bajo altera la calidad de vida, razón por la cual debe ser adecuadamente seleccionada y además advertir al paciente de las consecuencias que dicha cirugía puede ocasionar.

Introduction: The abdominoperineal resection (APR) was the standard treatment of middle-low rectal cancer, in the last 20 years the development of sparing techniques with sphincter preservation with adequate surgical and oncological results has allowed to offer the patient the sphincter apparatus preservation, avoiding the definitive colostomy, however, these techniques may present secondary incontinence to the loss of the rectum. Both surgical options can affect the quality of life of the patient and this element should be considered. Objective: To compare the change in quality of life of patients undergoing APR vs sphincter preserving techniques in patients operated for rectal cancer. Materials and Method: Cross-sectional cohort study with medium-low rectal cancer patients, operated in our hospital from 2009 to 2015. The instrument EuroQuol-5D2, validated in chilean spanish is used. Results: 39 patients were included (11 definitive colostomy and 28 sphincter preservation). In the analysis by domains, significant differences were observed favor to definitive colostomy in the Item of "Habitual Activities" and favor to sphincter preservation in the Item "Sexuality". Conclusions: In patients with middle-low rectal cancer, the choice of surgical technique have a measurable impact on the patient's quality of life.

Establishment of a nomogram predicting risk factors of postoperative perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Objective@#To investigate the risk factors of perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and to establish a nomogram model to predict the complications of perineal incision.@*Methods@#A case-control study was conducted to retrospectively collect the medical records of 213 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent APR at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to December 2016. The complications of perineal incision after APR were classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications (Version 2019), and the complications of grade II and above were defined as "clinically significant complications" .Twenty-two factors related to complication of perineal incision, such as gender, age, surgical procedure, surgical approach, perineal repair, placement of drainage tube, skin position of drainage tube, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, intraoperative local perfusion chemotherapy, tumor classification, pathological grade, tumor T stage, tumor TNM stage and so on, were analyzed by chi-square test for univariate risk factor of complication in all variables, and variables with P<0.2 in univariate analysis were further included in multivariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen out independent risk factors. R software (R 3.3.2) was introduced. The rms software package was used to construct a nomogram prediction model. The C-index was calculated (higher meaning better consistency with actual risk) to evaluate the discriminant degree of the model. The Bootstrap method was used to repeat the sampling for internal verification. A total of 42 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent APR from January 2017 to December 2017 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were externally validated, and the corrected C-index was calculated. The model conformity was determined by comparing the C-index calibration difference between the predicted and actual risks.@*Results@#Of the 213 patients with colorectal cancer, 131 were male and 82 were female, with mean age of (59.6±11.6) years. The incidence of postoperative perineal incision complications was 20.2% (43/213), including 27 cases of Clavien-Dindo II and above complications. Univariate analysis showed that the Eastern Cancer Cooperative Group (ECOG) score, preoperative albumin, skin position of drainage tube, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with complications of postoperative perineal incision (All P<0.05) . Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative albumin levels ≤38 g/L (OR=105.261, 95% CI: 7.781 to 1423.998, P<0.001), perinead drainage (OR=11.493, 95% CI: 1.379 to 95.767, P=0.024), intraoperative blood loss >110 ml (OR=6.476, 95% CI: 1.505 to 27.863, P=0.012) and preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (OR=7.479, 95% CI: 1.887 to 29.640, P=0.004) were postoperative clinically significant independent risk factors for perineal incision complications. The nomogram model was established. Preoperative albumin level <38 g/L was for 100 points, the preoperative chemoradiotherapy was for 52.5 points, the intraoperative blood loss >110 ml was for 28.5 points, and the perineal drainage was for 17.5 points. Adding all the points was the total score, and the complication rate corresponding to the total score was the predicted rate of the model. The model had a C-index of 0.863. After internal verification, the C-index dropped by 0.005. External verification showed a C-index of 0.841.@*Conclusions@#Preoperative nutritional status, skin position of drainage tube, intraoperative blood loss and preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy may affect the occurrence of perineal wound complications after APR for rectal cancer. The nomogram model constructed in this study is helpful for predicting the probability of clinically significant complications after APR.

Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with pelvic peritoneum closure for low rectal cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with pelvic peritoneum closure (LARP-PPC) for low rectal cancer.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 132 patients with low rectal cancer who were admitted to Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine from January 2014 to December 2017 were collected.There were 81 males and 51 females,aged from 45 to 83 years,with an average age of 62 years.Among the 132 patients,60 undergoing LARP-PPC were allocated into LARP-PPC group,and 72 patients undergoing conventional LARP were allocated into LARP group.All the patients received standardized preoperative and postoperative treatments.Observation indicators:(1) surgical and postoperative conditions;(2) postoperative pathological examination;(3) postoperative complications.The measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD,and the t test was used for comparison between groups.The measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M (range),and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups.The count data were expressed as absolute numbers,and the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability was used for comparison between groups.Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of ordinal data between groups.Results (1) Surgery and postoperative conditions:all the patients in the two groups underwent successful surgery without conversion to open surgery.The operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,time to first flatus,and time to first liquid intake of the LARP-PPC group were (163±45) minutes,168 mL(range,85-280 mL),2 days(range,1-5 days),3 days(range,2-6 days),versus (155±39) minutes,160 mL(range,100-305 mL),3 days(range,1-7 days),4 days(range,2-7 days) of the LARP group;there was no differencebetween the two group (t =1.113,Z =-1.623,-1.468,-0.321,P＞0.05).The duration of postoperative hospital stay in the LARP-PPC group and the LARP group were 16 days (range,11-21 days) and 19 days (14-24 days),respectively,with a significant difference between the two groups (Z =-5.888,P＜0.05)].In the LARP-PPC group,time of PPC was (13± 3) minutes.(2) Postoperative pathological examination:the length of specimen,the number of lymph node dissection,tumor diameter,cases with high-,middle-,and low-differentiated tumor in the LARP-PPC group was (18±4)cm,16±t5,(3.7±1.4)cm,10,34,16 in the LARP-PPC group,and (18±4)cm,16±5,(3.9±1.5) cm,13,41,18 in the LARP group,showing no significant difference between the two groups (t =0.779,0.390,0.703,Z=-0.267,P＞0.05).(3) Postoperative complications:cases with perineal wound infection,delayed perineal wound healing,intestinal obstruction,and perineal hernia were 2,1,1,0 in the LARP-PPC group,and 12,10,8,6 in the LARP group,showing significant differences between the two groups (x2 =6.137,6.400,P＜0.05).There were 2 and 4 patients with urinary tract infection in the LARP-PPC group and the LARP group,respectively,showing no significant difference between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion LARP-PPC is safe and feasible for the treatment of low rectal cancer,which can significantly reduce postoperative perineal-related complications and consequently shorten postoperative hospital stay.

Comparative analysis of robot-assisted vs. open abdominoperineal resection in terms of operative and initial oncological outcomes

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to objectively evaluate robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection (APR) in comparison with open APR, in terms of operative elements and initial oncological outcomes. METHODS: A total of 118 patients with lower rectal adenocarcinoma who had undergone curative APR were consecutively enrolled between June 2010 and June 2016, i.e., robot-assisted group (n = 40) and open group (n = 78). RESULTS: Transabdominal extralevator muscle excision was more frequently performed in the robot-assisted group than in the open group (68% vs. 42%, P = 0.012). In the robot-assisted group, the pain score at one day after surgery was less than in the open group, and the resumption of bowel function was earlier (P = 0.043 and P = 0.002, respectively). The occurrence of circumferential resection margin involvement (CRM+) was more than 5 times greater in the open group than in the robot-assisted group, presenting a marginal significance (P = 0.057). Although important postoperative morbidity did not generally differ between the 2 groups, voiding difficulty and male sexual dysfunction appeared to be encountered more frequently in the open group than in the robot-assisted group. CONCLUSION: The robot-assisted APR facilitated transabdominal extralevator excision and bowel recovery and demonstrated a trend towards reduced CRM+.

De la resección abdominoperineal a las técnicas conservadoras de esfínteres en la cirugía laparoscópica del cáncer del recto / From abdominoperineal resection to conservative techniques of interest in relation to laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

Introducción: la principal regla en el manejo del cáncer del recto es la cura oncológica y el mantenimiento de la calidad de vida. El advenimiento de la cirugía laparoscópica ha tenido un impacto en la cirugía gastrointestinal en los últimos 20 años. Tres décadas después de su original descripción por Heald, la escisión total del mesorrecto se ha convertido en la regla de oro para la resección curativa del cáncer del recto. Objetivos: revisar las diferentes opciones técnicas de las que se dispone en la actualidad para el tratamiento laparoscópico del cáncer del recto, mediante la descripción de sus resultados, ventajas y desventajas. Métodos: se realizó una revisión en las bases de datos bibliográficas accesibles por Infomed, que incluyó artículos que trataran el tema en español e inglés, mediante los descriptores de DeCS y MeSH. Resultados: el cáncer del último tercio del recto plantea un cambio significativo para el cirujano. La resección abdominoperineal ha sido considerada como la regla de oro para el tratamiento de los adenocarcinomas situados en el tercio medio y bajo del recto. Sin embargo, con el incremento del conocimiento de la enfermedad, el desarrollo de las técnicas quirúrgicas, la mejor instrumentación, y el uso de la radioquimioterapia preoperatoria, se ha llegado a un cambio en el tratamiento del cáncer de recto que va de la resección abdominoperineal con colostomía permanente a la cirugía preservadora del esfínter mediante las técnicas mínimamente invasivas. Conclusiones: la cirugía conservadora de esfínteres para el cáncer del recto mediante las técnicas mínimamente invasivas es posible en la mayoría de los pacientes con unos resultados a largo plazo iguales a los de la resección abdominoperineal(AU)

Introduction: the main rule for the management of rectal cancer is oncologic cure and the maintenance of quality of life. The advent of laparoscopic surgery has had an impact on gastrointestinal surgery over the last 20 years. Three decades following its original description by Heald, total mesorectal excision has become the gold standard for the curative resection of rectal cancer. Objectives: To review the different technical options currently available for the laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer, by describing their outcomes, advantages and disadvantages. Methods: A review was performed in the bibliographical databases accessible from Infomed, including articles on the topic written in Spanish and English, using DeCS and MeSH descriptors. Results: Cancer of the lower third of the rectum signifies a fundamental change for the surgeon. Abdominoperineal resection has been considered as the gold standard for the treatment of adenocarcinomas located in the middle and lower rectum. However, with increased knowledge of the disease, the development of surgical techniques, better instrumentation, and the use of preoperative radiochemotherapy, a change has been achieved in treating rectal cancer, which goes from abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy to conservative surgery of the sphincter using minimal invasive techniques. Conclusions: The conservative surgery of the sphincters for rectal cancer by minimal invasive techniques is possible to be performed in most patients, with long-term results similar to those of the abdominoperineal resection(AU)

A Misdiagnosed Case of Anal Canal Malignant Melanoma: A Case Report.

Anal canal malignant melanoma is an uncommon malignancy. It is a highly aggressive tumor that tends to spread early in the course and present with distant metastasis. Due to the rarity of the condition, treatment is yet to be standardized. We report a case of a 47-y ear-old male patient who presented with the history of mass coming out of anus for 6 months, which was misdiagnosed as a case of hemorrhoids. Abdominoperineal resection was done based on tissue biopsy which suggested it to be a primary anal canal malignant melanoma. The diagnosis was later confirmed by histopathological and immunohistochemistry studies, which was strongly positive for HMB 45 AND Melan-A.

Anatomy-based staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for scientific surgical planning of low rectal cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

Compared with patients with high-middle rectal cancer,local recurrent rate of low rectal cancer in patients is worse.The poor outcome of low rectal cancer is due to the unique anatomical features of the low rectum and the lack of clearly defined anatomical excision planes.Therefore,how to use the appropriate imaging methods,evaluate accurately preoperative cancer staging,plan feasible surgical plane and select the appropriate surgical approach,these will be very important for radical resection of rectal cancer.Therefore,the quality of life and long-term survival of the patients will be improved.

Emergency Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Prolapse with Gangrenous Bowel.

Rectal prolapse is a relatively rare condition. Most cases are chronic and present electively. However, a complete rectal prolapse with gangrenous bowel is an uncommon life-threatening emergency condition. Gangrenous bowel significantly increases morbidity and mortality and thus an urgent surgical intervention is always indicated. We describe a case with the above mentioned rare presentation, and he was successfully treated with an emergency abdominoperineal resection (APR). Irreducible rectal prolapse with gangrenous bowel is rarely encountered and literature on this presentation is very scanty. Here, we present a patient with complete rectal prolapsed with gangrenous bowel treated successfully with emergency APR.

Study of Different Adjuvant Treatment Regimens as a Complement to Surgery in Patients with Carcinoma Anorectum.

Background: In the present study we have done a retrospective as well as prospective studies of patients with carcinoma anorectum undergoing abdominoperineal resection with special emphasis on the role of adjuvant treatment regimens as a complement to surgery. Methods: 75 patients operated for APR were studied retrospectively and 25 patients operated for the same were studied prospectively. Results: It was observed that colorectal cancer is the most common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Rectum remains the most common site affected by it. Carcinoma anal canal is about one tenth as common as rectal cancer. Adjuvant treatment after surgery was studied with respect to the indications, the schedules followed and the subsequent complications. Conclusion: It was concluded that adjuvant treatment, in the form of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, has a definitive role in, both locally advanced Carcinoma Anorectum and for Dukes' C stage but it has its own complications which need to be addressed. Nigro's chemoradiation regimen has become the first choice for carcinoma anal canal, ahead of APR.

Comparison of Postoperative Efficacy between Cylindrical Abdominoperineal Resection by Laparoscopy and Traditional Abdominoperineal Resection / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To evaluate the efficacy between cylindrical abdominoperineal resection(CAPR)by laparoscopy and traditional abdominoperineal resection(APR). Methods A retrospectively analysis was done in the data of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent APR in our department from January 2010 to September 2015. The patients were divided into two groups,including cylindrical abdominoperineal resection by laparoscopy and traditional abdominoperineal resection. The operation time,intraoperative bleeding,the time of intestinal exhaust as well as the postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. Results There were no statistical differences in the intraoperative bleeding,operation time,the time of intestinal exhaust,postoperative intestinal obstruction and pulmonary infection between the two groups(P > 0.05). However,the differences in the rates of perineal incision infection and tumor intestinal perforation between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion CAPR by laparoscopy is safer,more reliable than traditional APR,which can effectively reduce the rates of postoperative incision infection and tumor intestinal perforation of patients.

Short-term Outcomes of an Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection in the Prone Position Compared With a Conventional Abdominoperineal Resection for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: The Early Experience at a Single Institution

PURPOSE: This study compared the perioperative and pathologic outcomes between an extralevator abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the prone position and a conventional APR. METHODS: Between September 2011 and March 2014, an extralevator APR in the prone position was performed on 13 patients with rectal cancer and a conventional APR on 26 such patients. Patients' demographics and perioperative and pathologic outcomes were obtained from the colorectal cancer database and electronic medical charts. RESULTS: Age and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level were significantly different between the conventional and the extralevator APR in the prone position (median age, 65 years vs. 55 years [P = 0.001]; median preoperative CEA level, 4.94 ng/mL vs. 1.81 ng/mL [P = 0.011]). For perioperative outcomes, 1 (3.8%) intraoperative bowel perforation occurred in the conventional APR group and 2 (15.3%) in the extralevator APR group. In the conventional and extralevator APR groups, 12 (46.2%) and 6 patients (46.2%) had postoperative complications, and 8 (66.7%) and 2 patients (33.4%) had major complications (Clavien-Dindo III/IV), respectively. The circumferential resection margin involvement rate was higher in the extralevator APR group compared with the conventional APR group (3 of 13 [23.1%] vs. 3 of 26 [11.5%]). CONCLUSION: The extralevator APR in the prone position for patients with advanced low rectal cancer has no advantages in perioperative and pathologic outcomes over a conventional APR for such patients. However, through early experience with a new surgical technique, we identified various reasons for the lack of favorable outcomes and expect sufficient experience to produce better peri- or postoperative outcomes.

Resección abdominoperineal isquioanal con reconstrucción de pared posterior de vagina con colgajo miocutáneo de músculo recto abdominal vertical / Ischioanal abdominoperineal resection with reconstruction of posterior wall of vagina with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap

El colgajo del recto abdominal miocutáneo vertical, es un excelente colgajo que rellena el gran defecto en la pelvis luego de una resección abdominoperineal isquioanal, siendo libre de tensión y reduciendo significativamente la incidencia de complicaciones de la herida perineal y la estancia hospitalaria, con el cual se puede reconstruir la pared posterior de la vagina. Se reporta aquí el primer caso en Costa Rica de una resección abdominoperineal isquioanal, con reconstrucción de pared posterior de vagina con colgajo del recto abdominal miocutáneo vertical, practicada con éxito en una paciente de 62 años, con un adenocarcinoma rectal localmente avanzado con infiltración de pared posterior de vagina.

Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, is an excellent flap that fills the large defect in the pelvis after an adominoperineal ischioanal resection; it is free from tension, significantly reduces the incidence of perineal wound complications and hospital stay and can be used to reconstruct the posterior wall of the vagina. We report the first case of Costa Rica abdominoperineal ischioanal resection with reconstruction of posterior vaginal wall with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, successfully practiced in a patient of 62 years with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma infiltrating posterior wall of the vagina.

Reconstrucción perineal inmediata en extensa resección abdominoperineal rectal / Immediate perineal reconstruction after vast rectal abdominoperineal resection

Background: Buschke-Lowenstein tumor is a benign skin lesion secondary to human papilloma virus infection. It usually appears as an exophytic anogenital mass and may progress to a squamous cell carcinoma. It can be treated with chemo, radio or immunotherapy and occasionally it requires radical surgery. Case report: We report a 53 years old male with a perianal lesion lasting 15 years that was treated with chemo-radiotherapy that relapsed with malignant transformation. Since the pathological study showed a squamous cell carcinoma, a rectal abdominoperineal resection was planned. The defect that left the surgical procedure was covered with musculocutaneous flaps from gracilis muscle of the thigh.

Introducción: El tumor de Buschke-Lõwenstein es una lesión cutánea benigna, secundaria a la infección por virus papiloma humano, usualmente se presenta como una gran masa exofítica genitoanal y tiene riesgo de evolucionar a carcinoma espinocelular. Dentro de su tratamiento existen varias alternativas, desde menos agresivas como quimio-radioterapia e inmunoterapia, que suelen tener alta tasa de recidiva, hasta la cirugía radical. Caso clínico: Presentamos el caso de un paciente masculino, con una lesión perianal de 15 años de evolución, inicialmente se sometió a terapias locales conservadoras y quimiorradioterapia y posteriormente recidivó con transformación maligna. Habiéndose confirmado histológicamente la presencia de carcinoma espinocelular, debió abordarse mediante una resección abdominoperineal rectal. Dicha cirugía determinó un gran defecto de cobertura perianal y perineal que fue reparado mediante colgajos músculo-cutáneos de gracilis y fasciocutáneos de muslo. Discusión: Si bien se han descrito algunos métodos de resección local, sólo la cirugía radical permite su eliminación completa disminuyendo el riesgo de recurrencia. Ello genera un defecto perianal de difícil manejo, para el cual existen varias opciones reconstructivas: injertos, colgajos locales y regionales, y, con menor frecuencia, colgajos libres. Se debe considerar que en aquellos defectos de gran tamaño, con gran pérdida de tejido, las opciones de reconstrucción del defecto con volumen y cobertura cutánea adecuada son limitadas. Presentamos nuestra experiencia con algunas de estas técnicas, entre las que destaca el colgajo de músculo gracilis, con los múltiples beneficios que posee.

Primary Anorectal Malignant Melanoma Treated With Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm that accounts for less than 1-4% of anorectal malignant tumors. The main therapeutic modality for anorectal melanoma is surgical treatment, with abdominoperineal resection or wide local excision being the most common approaches. A 77-year-old male with a history of cerebral infarction and hypertension presented with anal bleeding. Here, we report a case of anorectal melanoma treated by endoscopic mucosal resection with adjuvant interferon therapy rather than surgical resection. The patient has been disease-free for 5 years after endoscopic treatment.

Amputación abdominoperineal extraelevador como tratamiento de neoplasias anorrectales localmente avanzadas. Experiencia inicial / Extralevator abdominoperineal resection as treatment of locally advanced anorectal neoplasias. Initial experience

Introducción: la amputación abdominoperineal (AAP) fue durante muchas años el tratamiento de elección para los tumores de recto bajo y especialmente aquellos con compromiso del aparato esfinteriano. Algunas modificaciones a la técnica original, sugieren el aumento de la radicalidad a través de una resección cilíndrica (amputación abdominoperineal extraelevador). Esta estrategia permite ampliar los márgenes de resección circunferencial, con menor posibilidad de perforación o apertura tumoral, permitiendo así una menor recidiva local y mejores resultados oncológicos. El siguiente trabajo tiene por objetivo exponer los aspectos técnicos más relevantes y los resultados de la experiencia inicial con esta variante técnica. Diseño: Serie de casos. Pacientes y métodos: se analizaron todos los pacientes sometidos a una amputación abdominoperineal extraelevador (AAPE) intervenidos en el Sanatorio Güemes, en el período comprendido desde mayo 2011 hasta septiembre del 2013. Fueron analizadas variables: demográficas, índice ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist), índice de masa corporal (IMC), distancia del tumoral margen anal, tipo de cirugía, estadía hospitalaria y la morbilidad perioperatoria. Resultados: se incluyeron 5 pacientes, 4 de ellos pertenecían al sexo masculino. La media de edad fue de 61 años mientras que para el IMC fue de 29,8. Solamente en 1 paciente se realizó el abordaje laparoscópico. El tiempo operatorio medio fue de 266 minutos. La estadía hospitalaria en promedio fue de 8,6 días. Se registraron las siguientes complicaciones: dehiscencia parcial de colgajo cutáneo en 2 pacientes, fistula uretral (1 paciente) y eventración de la incisión mediana (1 paciente). El seguimiento medio de la serie fue de1 5 (8-24) meses. No hubo mortalidad en la serie. Un paciente presento una recidiva local...

Background: abdominoperineal resection (APR) has been, for many years, the treatment of choice for low rectal tumors, or those with sphincter involvement. In recent years, technical modifications (extralevator abdominoperineal resection) were performed, increasing the radicality of the original surgery. Thus oncologic outcomes were improved, with a decrease in the values of tumor perforation, circumferential resection margins involvement and a consequent lower local recurrence rates. This paper attempts to show the initial experience in this type of procedure. Design: Case series. Patients and methods: all patients who underwent extralevator abdominoperineal resection (EAPR) in the Sanatorio Güemes in the period from May 2011 to September 2013 were included. The variables analyzed were: demographic, ASA index (American Society of Anesthesiologist), body mass index (BMI), tumor distance from the anal verge, type of surgery, hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: five extralevator abdominoperineal resection were performed in 4 males. The mean age was 61 years and the mean BMI was 29.8. Only 1 laparoscopic approach was performed. The mean operative time was 266 min. The hospital stay was 8.6 days. The postoperative complications were: partial flap dehiscence (2 patients), urethral fistula (1 patient) and median incision hernia (1 patient). The median follow-up was 15 (8-24) months. Only one patient had a local recurrence...

Four-arm single docking full robotic surgery for low rectal cancer: techniques and post-operative outcomes / Cirurgia totalmente robótica para o tratamento do câncer do reto distal: técnicas e resultados do pós-operatório imediato

BACKGROUND: laparoscopic rectal surgery has not yet achieved a high penetration rate because of its steep learning curve and its relatively high conversion rate. Robotic rectal resection represents the main indication of the use of the robotic platform in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to present an early experience with robotic surgery to treat mid and low rectal cancer focusing on the technique and early postoperative outcomes. METHODS: from December 2012 to October 2013, a total of 16 patients with colorectal diseases were operated on using a four-arm single docking full robotic procedure (daVinci Si Surgical System). The treatment of six consecutive patients who underwent robotic rectal cancer surgery for mid or low rectal adenocarcinoma was prospectively analyzed regarding technique standardization, pathological findings and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: there were no conversions and one intraoperative complication. The mean operative time was 245 min (180-360 min). The mean console time was 170 min (110-240 min). All patients underwent a standardized totally robotic rectal dissection. There were no mortality or urinary dysfunction and one complication (postoperative ileo-16%). The median length of hospital stay was 6 (4-11 days). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 22 (7-38), and distal and circumferential resection margins were negative in all specimen. R0 resection was achieved in all cases and complete total mesorectal excision in five specimen and nearly complete in one. CONCLUSION: standardized robotic rectal surgery is a promising alternative to treat patients with mid or low rectal cancer and is expected to overcome the low penetration rate of laparoscopic surgery in this field. This technique was successfully performed in six patients with excellent immediate postoperative and pathological results. Additional studies in a large series of patients are necessary to confirm those advantages. (AU)

INTRODUÇÃO: a utilização da cirurgia videolaparoscópica para o tratamento do câncer do reto ainda não apresentou uma alta penetração devido a longa curva de aprendizado e a uma taxa de conversão relativamente alta. A ressecção retal robótica é a principal indicação para o uso da plataforma robótica na cirurgia colorretal. O objetivo desse estudo é apresentar as técnicas e os resultados pós-operatórios imediatos com o uso da cirurgia robótica para o tratamento do câncer do reto distal. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: no período de dezembro de 2012 a outubro de 2013 foram operados 16 pacientes com patologias colorretais utilizando o robô daVinci SI Surgical System. O tratamento de 6 consecutivos pacientes portadores de câncer do reto do terço médio e do terço inferior foram prospectivamente avaliados quanto a sistematização técnica, achados patológicos e evolução pós-operatória. RESULTADOS: não houve conversão e ocorreu uma complicação intraoperatória. A duração média das operações foi de 245 minutos (180-360 minutos) e o tempo médio do uso do console foi de 170 minutos (110-240 minutos). Ocorreu uma complicação pós-operatória (Íleo) e não houveram nenhuma disfunção urinária ou mortalidade. A duração média da internação hospitalar foi de 6 dias (4-11 dias). O número médio de linfonodos examinados foi de 22 (7-38) e todas as peças tinham margens distal e circunferencial negativas. Ressecção RO foi observada em todos os casos e o grau de excisão total do mesorreto foi completo em 5 peças e quase completo em uma. CONCLUSÃO: cirurgia robótica sistematizada esta tendo uma crescente aceitação e é uma ótima alternativa para o tratamento dos pacientes com câncer do reto distal. Esta tecnologia foi utilizada em 6 pacientes com excelentes resultados não só na recuperação pós-operatória imediata como também nos achados da avaliação patológica. Grandes series randomizadas são importantes para confirmar as possíveis vantagens dessa nova tecnologia. (AU)